Tahlequah Daily Press

Archive

February 27, 2007

Take a tax break with new deductions

Once you’ve gathered all the documents needed for filing taxes - W-2s, receipts and anything else - it’s time to see just what can and cannot be written off as a deduction.

This year, the government has a few surprises for taxpayers.

Through a new Telephone Excise Tax Refund, individuals, businesses and tax-exempt organizations are eligible for a one-time refund on long-distance phone taxes collected between March 2003 and July 2006. The service can be through landline, cell phone or Voice-over Internet Protocol, and is, according to the Internal Revenue Service, going to be the most wide-reaching refund in IRS history, with more than 160 million filers qualifying.

“It’s a credit issued due to overpayment of excise tax,” said H&R; Block Office Manager and Tax Associate Cynthia Holt.

The phone plan must have been in the taxpayer’s name, according to Holt.

According to the IRS, taxpayers have two options: A standard refund amount between $30 and $60, “based on the total number of exemptions claimed on their 2006 tax return,” which eliminates having to dig out old phone bills; or, “they can locate these [old] bills and use the actual amount.”

(For citizens who won’t be filing tax returns this year, the refund is still available through new form 1040 EZ-T.)

The TETR announcement came near the end of 2006, surprising some. Others, still yet, haven’t heard of the new deduction opportunity.

“That’s pretty good news; I hadn’t heard it,” said Tera Eubanks. “I’d like to know if we can go back before 2003.”

According to MSNBC.com, taxpayers are only eligible for three years’ worth of payments because of an IRS rule stipulating tax refunds go back only three years from the date the refund is announced.

Businesses and tax-exempt organizations can file through old phone bills for the past 41 months to base their telephone tax refund on the actual amount of tax paid.

Text Only
Poll

What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
Undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Raw: Orthodox Christians Observe Easter Rite Ceremony Marks 19th Anniversary of OKC Bombing Raw: Four French Journalists Freed From Syria Raw: Massive 7.2 Earthquake Rocks Mexico Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism
Stocks