Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

July 26, 2012

Romney should show tax returns

TAHLEQUAH — Everyone already knows Mitt Romney’s a millionaire. Any voter who would reject him for president based on his income has already done that. So why is he fussing so much about releasing his tax returns?

Romney wants voters to hire him for a job – one of the most important jobs in the world. And the president is not a private citizen; he’s about the most public person on the globe. The American people have a right to personal information about him they wouldn’t get for anyone else.

Ironically, Romney’s own father, George, started the tradition of politicians’ releasing tax returns. In the ensuing 40 years, most political aspirants have reasoned this denotes  transparency. When a candidate won’t comply, it suggests he might have something to hide. Though a candidate is not required to provide these details, doing so suggests an attempt to be above-board and honest. It offers a peek into his priorities, and reveals something about character. For astute voters, and for those riding the fence, this information can be a deciding factor.

Several years ago, when Al Gore was running for president, one of his tax returns created  a stir. Despite his comfortable cash flow and hefty portfolio, Gore had only donated $400 and change to charity the previous year. Under the commonly held wisdom that what you do with your money is more important than how much you have, this was a revealing statement for voters. The average middle-class American was donating more than five times that.

Romney was likely embarrassed by the fact that he only paid 13.9 percent taxes in 2010, and this is understandable. This shines a glaring light on what many people consider to be a problem with the current tax system, since most Americans pay more like 25 or 28 percent, or even more. But this isn’t the underlying issue; in fact, Romney’s 2010 tax return raised more questions than it answered.

For instance, how did Romney end up with a $100 million IRA, in light of contribution limits for retirement plans? Is it appropriate for a presidential candidate to bet against the U.S. dollar by investing in Swiss francs? Most folks would also invest in Swiss banks if they had the money, but in this case, they may be forgiven for wondering whether the Romneys reported everything they made, or if they took advantage of an amnesty program in 2009 for unreported foreign bank accounts. And the public might also legitimately ask whether Romney reported and paid gift taxes on his mammoth trust funds. Maybe Romney is just sensitive about his wealth, which is so vast it’s incomprehensible to most people. Or maybe there’s something he doesn’t want the public to know – something that would be seized upon by CPAs, tax experts and financial experts as evidence of a footloose approach to financial and tax law.

The president of the U.S. is one of the most powerful people in the world. His influence reaches not just every domestic domain from the Beltway, to the plains, mountains and sea. It also affects what happens at pinnacles of power, like 10 Downing and the Kremlin, all the way to the smallest village in sub-Saharan Africa.

The president’s salary and benefits package of $600,000 is insignifcant compared to what Romney’s used to pulling in. But as president, he will have access to something far more important than another income: He’ll have the kind of power that could make us or break us – literally, access to a button that controls our fate.

So, yes, how much money Romney has earned is our business, and to a great extent, so is what he’s done with that money. It’s the best indication of what he might do with ours.

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • As education, good jobs falter, violent crime rate will go up

    As April winds down, and with it Child Abuse Prevention Month, it’s worth again noting that the rate of violence in Oklahoma has been creeping up in recent years. And it’s time for our state’s top leaders – who wear blinders when it comes to anything negative – to discuss what we’re going to do about it.
    Late last year, the FBI listed Oklahoma as the 10th most dangerous state in the union, based on statistics from 2012. Violent crimes are rape, murder, robbery and aggravated assault. Some Okies might find it a bit disconcerting to learn that our state ranked above California and New York in this data. Topping the list was Tennessee, followed by Nevada, Alaska, New Mexico, South Carolina, Delaware, Louisiana, Florida and Maryland.

    April 23, 2014

  • Ban on wage hikes by municipalities a mark of hypocrisy

    The words “God” and “governor” may share the same first two letters, but the two are hardly interchangeable.
    But let’s assume Gov. Mary Fallin really isn’t deluded enough to place her powers on the level of a deity. What rationale would a woman who has championed smaller government and local control use to explain her hypocrisy in banning individual Oklahoma cities from raising minimum wages in their jurisdictions?

    April 18, 2014

  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

Poll

How confident are you that the immunizations for infants and children are reasonably safe?

Not at all confident.
Somewhat confident.
Relatively confident.
Extremely confident.
undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Stocks