Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

April 9, 2013

Lack of insurance a complex issue

TAHLEQUAH — If a bill wending its way through the Oklahoma House is intended to take punitive action against uninsured drivers, it might work as planned. But unfortunately, the bill’s author doesn’t have much evidence to back up his assertion that it will lower the number of uninsured drivers.

Jason Nelson, R-Oklahoma City, undoubtedly shares the frustration of many law-abiding Okies who dutifully pay their rising premiums, as they’re required to do. Meanwhile, some of their friends and neighbors thumb their noses at state law, and tool around without insurance, heedless of the consequences. Eventually, many of these folks will be involved in traffic accidents, and if it’s their fault, their innocent victims will be left holding the bag.

Nelson has probably looked at statistics, and knows many families whose lives have crumbled into financial ruin after accidents with an uninsured motorists. Sky-high medical bills and the cost of vehicle repairs, or a completely new car, can decimate a family’s budget. When an uninsured motorist is to blame, justice is difficult to achieve, and financial recompense nearly impossible. And nearly a quarter of Oklahomans are without automobile insurance.

Nelson’s proposal takes aim at “insurance deadbeats” by preventing them from collecting monetary damages from an automobile accident, even if someone else is to blame. The bill includes certain exemptions – for instance, if the faulted driver deliberately crashed or was intoxicated.

Democrats on the committee that passed the bill onto the full House speculated the measure may violate the state constitution, and Nelson admitted he didn’t know if it did. Perhaps he should have gotten his ducks in a straighter row before he sponsored the bill, because if it becomes law and is later challenged, the taxpayers will be enriching another gaggle of attorneys.

Another question was asked about the bill’s effectiveness in tamping down the number of uninsured motorists. In fact, the Insurance Research Council has determined similar bills have brought down that number by less than 2 percent. That’s not exactly a ringing endorsement.

There’s little doubt the bill would punish the uninsured, in pretty much the same way the so-called “debtor’s prison” would take society’s revenge on folks who don’t pay their bills. For many people who have fallen on hard times, it’s not a matter of refusing to repay their debts; it’s a case of the inability to do so. And while it’s certainly true that many people forego insurance so they can afford to buy booze and meth and pay for cable TV, others give up relative luxuries like insurance so they can put food on the table. The old axiom that you can’t take blood from a turnip applies well to this scenario.

It’s a difficult dilemma, and Nelson’s instincts are understandable. But if the constitutionality of the measure is in question, he should deal with that now, rather than later. And he and other House members need to decide whether they want to lump those who are needy through no fault of their own with the chronic deadbeats.

No one who breaks the allow should be able to enrich himself at table of someone else’s misery. But shouldn’t the person who’s at fault – regardless of insurance status – have to shoulder the brunt of the responsibility?

Another question worth asking: If lawmakers are so bent on making drivers accept responsibility for their actions, their insurance and so forth, why do they keep spurning attempts to pass a law against texting while driving? It might be tempting to say it’s a Republican-vs.-Democrat situation, with the Republicans shunning any attempts to limit personal freedoms, even when public safety is a prime concern.

There’s probably a simpler explanation. While all Oklahoma legislators can afford automobile insurance, thanks to the generosity of taxpayers, they probably feel they can’t afford to give up texting and driving.

The rest of us can be forgiven for suspecting many of those who would be pulled over for texting infractions would be motoring to and from the statehouse.

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • Ban on wage hikes by municipalities a mark of hypocrisy

    The words “God” and “governor” may share the same first two letters, but the two are hardly interchangeable.
    But let’s assume Gov. Mary Fallin really isn’t deluded enough to place her powers on the level of a deity. What rationale would a woman who has championed smaller government and local control use to explain her hypocrisy in banning individual Oklahoma cities from raising minimum wages in their jurisdictions?

    April 18, 2014

  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

Poll

What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
Undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Stocks