Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

April 9, 2013

Congress should sacrifice, too

TAHLEQUAH — Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel set the tone for what should become a widespread trend, if there’s any real justice to be spotted in the midst of budget sequestration.

Sequestration – which prompts automatic budget cuts – was set in motion by Congress’ refusal to compromise on federal constraints. The administration caved in and agreed to a number of trims, even suggesting Social Security cost-of-living increases and other entitlements might be on the table, but it still wanted additional revenue sources through small tax hikes on the upper echelon and certain behemoth corporations. The House, in its persistent loyalty to the tea party and the ultra-wealthy, refused to give an inch. And thus, many federal employees will be subjected to two weeks of furloughs by the end of the year.

In solidarity with their furloughed civilian employees, Hagel said he and Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter will return a proportionate share of their own salaries to federal coffers. President Obama responded by cutting his own pay 5 percent for 2013. Since his salary can’t be changed during a term, he’ll be cutting a check to the government. Then, Secretary of State John Kerry followed suit.

Opponents of Obama – and by extension, anyone in his cabinet – will decry the pay cuts as publicity stunts, though it’ll do them little good: Obama can’t seek another term and Hagel will likely leave his job when Obama does. And they will rightly point out that Obama is unlikely to miss 5 percent of his $400,000 salary. However, the detractors have to tread carefully, because those in the upper 1 percent Congress has been protecting have claimed they can’t make ends meet if an even smaller portion of their incomes were taken through tax hikes.

Whatever motive is attributed to Hagel’s and Obama’s action, the symbolic gesture of “shared sacrifice” should make the lasting impression. Though Obama’s salary is considerable, how many of us could afford a $20,000 pay cut without resorting to public assistance? And how many of us are donating about 22 percent of our adjusted gross incomes to charity? That’s what the Obamas did in 2011 (the last year for which figures are available), starting with an adjusted gross income of $789,674. And while that’s an enormous sum to most of  us in the Cherokee County workforce, it’s nary a drop in the bucket for the much-ballyhooed and zealously protected upper 1 percent, who are statistically known for their lack of sharing with the less fortunate.

Pundits like Sean Hannity are scoffing and insisting the president’s vacations to Hawaii in Florida suggest he’s out of touch with the suffering most of us must endure. But Hannity, like other disingenuous public figures of his ilk, never mentions George W. Bush’s perpetual cycle of vacations, though his liberal counterparts did so back in the day (and are perhaps silent now). Either way, few talking heads ever offer to do anything for their fellow Americans, unless spewing venom and crowing half-truths counts for “anything.”

But they’re private citizens, after all, and can thus feel more self-righteous about their stinginess. That’s not exactly the case for those on the taxpayer teat.

If Hagel and Obama can sacrifice a portion of their income to assuage their guilt over the sequester, then so should the members of Congress, Vice President Joe Biden, and all the other “public servants” who populate the Beltway and fortuitously escaped the furlough. Each member of Congress pulls in a minimum of $174,000 per year, and that’s not including benefits and other perks, or the weighty stipends for their leaders. It’s no stretch to suggest the delegates who actually deserve their salaries comprise a percentage far smaller than Obama’s pay cut.

Are any of them offering to share the sacrifice they expect from other Americans? So far, we’ve heard only crickets chirping. That’s about what we’ve come to expect from Capitol Hill when it comes to doing what’s right.

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

  • Mom responsible for watching kid; restaurant’s not

    If you allowed your child to drink a bottle of drain cleaner, would you feign surprise when he fell to the floor, twitching and foaming at the mouth? If you left your curling iron within reach of your baby and she pulled it off the vanity and burned her hand, would you plan revenge on the store that sold you the appliance?
    You just might, if you’re among the litigious Americans who have abdicated parental responsibility to either sloth or the hope of a better tomorrow through a cash settlement.

    March 19, 2014

Poll

What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
Undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Stocks