Tahlequah Daily Press


January 18, 2013

Scales tipped in favor of NCAA athletes

TAHLEQUAH — How much does it cost to put the average American student through college? Many people might be shocked – but they probably won’t be surprised to learn athletes are worth more than students with superior academic credentials.

A report by the American Institutes for Research indicates most universities under the NCAA Division 1 umbrella spend three to six times as much on an athlete as they do to educate the average student. The report shows that in 2010, Division 1 institutions spent $39,000 on the average athlete, while the average biology or English major was worth a comparatively paltry investment of $11,800. The gap is even wider for the Football Bowl Subdivision, where an athlete was worth $92,000 on average, while another student might be worth about $14,000.

If those figures aren’t startling enough, data indicates the chasm is growing wider. Moreover, while about a quarter of the athletic departments make enough money to stand on their own, the rest must be subsidized by their respective universities to help pick up the tab. Those costs are usually funded by student activity fees – a reality that will sound familiar to students at NSU, OU and OSU.

Another fact the average individual may find troubling: About one-third of athletic spending at Division 1 universities goes for salaries and compensation, while facilities and equipment eat up 20 percent of the budget. It’s not uncommon for a head football coach at a major university to have a salary significantly higher than that of the institution’s president. This is notably the case at OU, where Bob Stoops was compensated more than $4.5 million last year, while President David Boren was paid less than $400,000.

OU fans may question the wisdom of such a lavish package for Stoops, especially in light of the Sooners’ 41-13 Cotton Bowl loss this year to the Texas A&M Aggies. Boren, on the other hand, is a former U.S. senator, and was able to parlay his wide net of influence to pull up the ailing school by its bootstraps when he took the helm. It should be noted that while Boren’s pay comes entirely from OU itself, only $250,000 of Stoops’ compensation does; the rest comes from “unrestricted private funds” and bonuses. Typically this means alumni and boosters.

Many folks will call this an outrage. But before patrons and parents raise a chorus to cry foul and demand more parity between athletics and academics, we first must assign blame. To use a well-worn cliche, we’ve seen the enemy, and it is us.

Universities spend the way they do because a good athletics program lures more students, athletes and academics alike. Respectable sports programs also draw in good athletes, who in turn make the program even better – and as it improves, the student body grows, swelling the institution’s coffers even further.

Solid athletics programs also attract billions of dollars from alumni and corporations looking to link their names with a standout player, coach or team. And as government funding continues to dry up, especially in states like Oklahoma, educational institutions will increasingly look for outside money to supplement their budgets. This is why, even at Tahlequah High School, we hear of businesses sponsoring various facets of a team – even up to putting a name on a touchdown.

The alumni have their checkbooks, but so do fans. One need look no further than a Bedlam game between OU and OSU to grasp the fierceness with which some fans will defend their teams – with both words and cash. Far more folks will pay a couple of hundred dollars to snare a coveted Bedlam ticket than will pay 10 bucks to listen to a lecture sponsored by the science club, or attend a symphony presented by the university orchestra.

Fortunately for the academic end of the spectrum, funds generated by successful athletic programs often benefit other students through more than mere school reputation. Monies often fund facilities that can be used by the student body in general, or other academic departments. Non-athletes can also live in the usually-posh athletic dorms. So it is possible for the rest of the campus population to dine on crumbs that fall from the tables of the royalty.

Yes, it’s unfair, and yes, it’s in many ways self-defeating, since only a tiny fraction of college athletes will take their skills to a professional level, while the opposite is true of exceptional academics. But until the public changes its perception of sports and their veneration of athletes, the scales are unlikely to tip for this particular inequality. We’re a market-based economy, and for now, sports is what sells.

Text Only
  • As education, good jobs falter, violent crime rate will go up

    As April winds down, and with it Child Abuse Prevention Month, it’s worth again noting that the rate of violence in Oklahoma has been creeping up in recent years. And it’s time for our state’s top leaders – who wear blinders when it comes to anything negative – to discuss what we’re going to do about it.
    Late last year, the FBI listed Oklahoma as the 10th most dangerous state in the union, based on statistics from 2012. Violent crimes are rape, murder, robbery and aggravated assault. Some Okies might find it a bit disconcerting to learn that our state ranked above California and New York in this data. Topping the list was Tennessee, followed by Nevada, Alaska, New Mexico, South Carolina, Delaware, Louisiana, Florida and Maryland.

    April 23, 2014

  • Ban on wage hikes by municipalities a mark of hypocrisy

    The words “God” and “governor” may share the same first two letters, but the two are hardly interchangeable.
    But let’s assume Gov. Mary Fallin really isn’t deluded enough to place her powers on the level of a deity. What rationale would a woman who has championed smaller government and local control use to explain her hypocrisy in banning individual Oklahoma cities from raising minimum wages in their jurisdictions?

    April 18, 2014

  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014


How confident are you that the immunizations for infants and children are reasonably safe?

Not at all confident.
Somewhat confident.
Relatively confident.
Extremely confident.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video