Tahlequah Daily Press


February 18, 2013

Give Hagel an up-down vote

TAHLEQUAH — What does the nomination of former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel as U.S. defense secretary have to do with President Obama’s actions in the wake of the raid on America’s diplomatic mission in Libya?

Nothing. But like so many other people who have aspired to positions of power within one presidential administration or another, he has fallen victim to political posturing.

Last week, the Senate came up one person short to give Hagel the ballyhooed “up-or-down” vote, although supporters have pledged to revisit the nomination after Congress’ upcoming break. That these people deserve any type of break is almost laughable, because it would be difficult to cite any significant accomplishments this once-venerable body has made over the past many months.

Hagel, who held his Nebraska Senate seat for two terms and is a twice-wounded Vietnam combat veteran, is imminently qualified. It’s true he stepped on the toes of some of his more conservative colleagues by crossing party lines. Back then, compromise, gentility and bipartisanship were expected. But these days, it seems civility has been tossed out the window.

Many folks will remember not long ago that President George Bush put up a few controversial nominees for various posts, and Democrats were using stalling tactics to keep them out. Republicans repeatedly clamored for the “up-or-down” vote on Bush’s picks, and complained about how unfair it was that the president’s agenda was being held hostage. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and some of the same Republicans in Congress who decried delays under Bush are leading the pack against Obama.

Part of the “problem” with Hagel relates to statements and votes he’s made in the past when it comes to Israel, Iran, Iraq and nuclear weapons. It would seem even the most subtle criticism of Israel is enough to get an official blacklisted these days. The same goes for anyone who appears, even for the slightest moment, to express a dovish view when it comes to those tyrannical Middle Eastern regimes.

It’s understandable that many in Congress would prefer a “hawk” in the defense chair. What’s puzzling is why long-time Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham would block Hagel’s confirmation because they don’t like the answers they’re getting from Obama about when he contacted Libyan officials after the attack in Benghazi last year.

Yes, four lives were lost, and for the families of the dead, there’s no way to diminish the pain or the frustration over what was likely faulty intelligence or botched efforts in the aftermath. But it must also be said that these individuals understood the hazards of their job. Diplomats know they can be killed, and even if that hasn’t happened in 30 years, it’s a real possibility. They willingly put their lives on the line in service to their country.

The same cannot be said of the nearly 2,800 people killed in the attacks of 9/11. Those accountants, stockbrokers, educators, secretaries,  janitors and others did not consider themselves in a war zone, and yet, that’s what “Ground Zero” turned out to be. Although the Bush administration certainly did not invite or cause this unspeakable tragedy, there’s no doubt intelligence failures occurred.

The behavior of McCain and Graham suggests the Benghazi intelligence failures, under Obama, were somehow worse than those of 9/11, under Bush. For anyone able to step back and look at both situations with a dispassionate eye, the contrast is remarkable – and so is the hypocrisy.

What’s sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. A president – whether Democrat or Republican – has a right to pick his Cabinet without being obstructed every step of the way, unless the candidate is indeed unworthy.

Untold thousands of Americans understandably resent Obama’s re-election; many of those folks are right here in Tahlequah. But whether we like it or not, Obama is the democratically elected president. Even those of us who don’t respect the man should at least respect the office. That means according him the same privileges of his predecessors, and refraining from holding him to standards we’d never dream of imposing on those predecessors.

Hagel deserves an up-or-down vote, and it’s embarrassing that members of his own party are standing in his way. What are they afraid of?

Text Only
  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

  • Mom responsible for watching kid; restaurant’s not

    If you allowed your child to drink a bottle of drain cleaner, would you feign surprise when he fell to the floor, twitching and foaming at the mouth? If you left your curling iron within reach of your baby and she pulled it off the vanity and burned her hand, would you plan revenge on the store that sold you the appliance?
    You just might, if you’re among the litigious Americans who have abdicated parental responsibility to either sloth or the hope of a better tomorrow through a cash settlement.

    March 19, 2014


What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Obama Hopeful on Ukraine, Will Watch Russians Flamingo Frenzy Ahead of Zoo Construction Crew Criticized Over Handling of Ferry Disaster Agreement Reached to Calm Ukraine Tensions Raw: Pope Francis Performs Pre-easter Ritual Raw: Bulgarian Monastery Dyes 5000 Easter Eggs Diplomats Reach Deal to Ease Tensions in Ukraine U.S. Sending Nonlethal Aid to Ukraine Military Holder: Americans Stand With KC Mourners Obama Greets Wounded Warriors Malaysia Plane: Ocean Floor Images 'Very Clear' Sparks Fly With Derulo and Jordin on New Album Franco Leads Star-studded Broadway Cast Raw: Two Lucky Kids Get Ride in Popemobile Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later Sister of Slain MIT Officer Reflects on Bombing