Tahlequah Daily Press


November 11, 2013

E-cig regulation: Not about health, but about money

TAHLEQUAH — To ban or not to ban: That is the question, isn’t it?

So we all seem to agree that the science against or for e-cigarettes is still in its infancy. At the same time, let us remember that it is not a very complicated system to test.

We are not talking about DNA gene-splicing or something complicated like that. The chemicals used in the e-cig are basic, and it would seem to me that if there was something inherently unhealthy about it, we would have had something definitive by now.

owever, I don’t think it matters, because at the end of the day, I don’t believe government will make its decision based on the science, but as it most often does, on politics.

Why do I say this? Take cigarettes, for example. They are banned from public parks and in most cities, but can any of us really say it is inherently unhealthy to the general public to be in the same park as a smoker? I have asthma and I am greatly bothered by smoke, but I am not bothered by smoke that is 5 feet away from me. Banning smoking in parks is not about a true health concern, but it is more about the politics of smoking in general.

Being for smoking bans right now is good politics. If it were really about clean air and health, we would ban automobiles from around Norris Park, because that, more than smoking, is of greater health consequence than an e-cig. I

 know from personal experience how car exhaust affects me, even being 20 feet away. If it were truly about clean air, we would also require cars to be smogged, and we would ban the burning of trash and not allow people to use fireplaces.

Pollution from industry and automobiles harms more people than smoking, and especially the dry vapor of an e-cig. That is an undeniable fact. However, it is easier for government to use a minority of smokers to be the scapegoat of unhealthy living than to attack an entire state of drivers, coal producers, and fire-burning residents. Well, at least for now, it is.

Here is another fact to consider. If the ban goes into effect and the city gets its certification and money, can we honestly say we are a cleaner and healthier city, all of sudden?

Does Tahlequah, in one day, have rays of sunshine fall upon it from above, and all the cases of COPD, emphysema, asthma, et al, suddenly go away or decrease? No, this would be a silly notion to accept.

Banning vapor-producing e-cigs from our public parks will not help one smoker quit the habit and will not prevent a new person from becoming a smoker, but instead will just make it harder for current smokers to quit.

This certification may make many politicians, and those involved in SWAT, feel good about themselves because they are true believers of their cause and believe they must ban smoking and things that resemble smoking at all levels, despite the logic and science against their belief.

This ban will not help current smokers at all; it will just offend them all, and it will in some part harm them as well. This ordinance is more about city marketing, propaganda, and of course, money.

We also heard last week that we should err on the side of caution. How about taking a more logical approach and not err at all? I can understand the concern about indoor use of the e-cig, but I surely don’t accept or understand the banning of it at our outdoor city facilities, like our parks.

That is illogical when you consider all the other sources of pollution present in our city. Vapor from the e-cig is the least of them.

The other concern put forth was about children watching adults using these e-cigs at our parks and the chance of their being enticed into using them. This thinking also has flaws in logic, because those same adults will be using the devices with their own kids at home.

Those same adults will be “vaping” as they walk the sidewalks near the park, outside of grocery stores etc. Unless we allow the health police to ban it altogether in the public sphere, children will continue to see people smoke and “vape” both in life and on TV. What is the solution to this perceived problem? Good parenting, not bans.

The strange thing about this specific ban being proposed is that this is the first time I can think of that a local government is considering banning a legal product that is attempting to solve a public ill and has been shown to be successful at it.

Smoking and its unhealthy side effects is a huge cost and burden upon our society, and we have smart people apart from government funding coming up with real solutions. Why, oh why. are we talking about banning a product that is actually helping people quit this habit? That makes no logical sense.

“Hey. mom, what is that guy puffing out of his mouth?” “Son, that is a person trying to quit the nasty habit of smoking.”

People, there is tunnel vision going on in this debate. E-cigs are about helping people quit a bad habit. I have not heard anyone on either side of this debate dispute this fact. Why then are we talking about banning a positive tool in that fight? It brings us back to money, politics and propaganda.

At least, that is how it appears to me, but I am open to correction on this.

I don’t believe this issue really is about the science or lack thereof, but it is really about what is best for our citizens and what they want. Do our citizens want a ban? Would this ban help our citizens?

This is what I would be considering if I were mayor or on the city council. But I am not, so the ball is in our elected leaders’ court to decide.

You have heard the opposition loud and clear, and it was overwhelming against the ban. Now it is for our leaders to decide. I do thank our mayor for being the un-mayor in these matters and being open to this dialogue and debate in such a public way. I am impressed by his openness.

Al Soto is a Tahlequah businessman.

Text Only
  • NSU needs to be more candid when its plans go awry

    Many area residents were disappointed to learn this week that the NSU Fitness Center, and its all-important indoor lap pool, won’t open next month, as originally announced.
    This latest delay is no surprise.

    July 28, 2014

  • Higher premiums a just reward for drunken drivers

    Over the past several years, Oklahoma has slipped in many of the polls that count. This week, we learned Tulsa is No. 4 on a list of cities with high rates of fatal DUI accidents. Is anyone really surprised?

    July 25, 2014

  • Maybe it’s time to think about having another BalloonFest

    The 18th annual BalloonFest was the last one held, in 2010. In summer 2011, when the Daily Press staff hadn’t heard anything about the much-anticipated event, we started asking questions.

    July 23, 2014

  • If you see a drunken driver, take the time to call in a report

    If you see something, say something. You’ve heard the warning, and seen it imprinted on placards at airports. In the wake of 9/11, it became a national mantra, mainly aimed at spotting potential terrorist activities. But it’s good advice anytime, and for any reason, even at the local level.

    July 14, 2014

  • City officials should stop squabbling and try to work together

    It’s bad enough that the Chamber of Commerce scandal has given Tahlequah a black eye. But if the bickering among city officials doesn’t stop, the community will have a complete set of shiners for its public face.

    July 11, 2014

  • Only full disclosure will restore trust in the chamber

    Despite pressure from some quarters, neither the Press nor anyone else who values full disclosure will be clamming up until all the facts are known, and those who are responsible meet with justice.

    July 10, 2014

  • Only full disclosure will restore trust in the chamber

    A few board members for the Tahlequah Area Chamber of Commerce are saying they’ve heard nothing but positive things lately – about the chamber itself, and presumably, about themselves.

    July 9, 2014

  • Employer-sponsored insurance may now be a ‘hostage’ situation

    When the fallout settles from the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision, many Americans might decide they’re better off with health insurance that doesn’t come from their boss.

    July 7, 2014

  • With confidence in Congress at 7 percent, time for a new slate

    Note to Congress: We don’t like you. Not at all.
    A Gallup poll released Monday, June 30 confirmed what most of us already know: the American public is disgusted with the House and Senate. The survey recorded the lowest level of confidence since Gallup began asking the question in 1991: a whopping 7 percent. That’s not a typographical error; it’s a single digit.

    July 2, 2014

  • New chamber head needs to be free from scandal’s taint

    Every time another layer is peeled off the unfolding saga of the Tahlequah Area Chamber of Commerce embezzlement case, those going through the records hope they might see a light at the end of the tunnel. So far, that hasn’t happened.

    June 30, 2014


Do you believe school administrators and college presidents in Oklahoma are paid too much?

Strongly agree.
Somewhat agree.
Somewhat disagree.
Strongly disagree.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Two Women Narrowly Avoid Being Hit by Train In Virginia, the Rise of a New Space Coast New Sanctions on Key Sectors of Russian Economy Crayola Announces Family Attraction in Orlando US Ready to Slap New Sanctions on Russia Kerry: Not Worried About Israeli Criticism Boater Rescued From Edge of Kentucky Dam Girl Struck by Plane on Florida Beach Dies Rodents Rampant in Gardens Around Louvre House to Vote on Slimmed-down Bill for Border Looming Demand Could Undercut Flight Safety Raw: 2 Shells Hit Fuel Tank at Gaza Power Plant Raw: Massive Explosions From Airstrikes in Gaza Giant Ketchup Bottle Water Tower Up for Sale Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short Kerry: Humanitarian Cease-fire Efforts Continue Raw: Corruption Trial Begins for Former Va Gov. The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming Traditional African Dishes Teach Healthy Eating