Tahlequah Daily Press


February 13, 2013

Playing politics with VAWA bad

TAHLEQUAH — With the high American Indian population in this state, Oklahomans have difficulty comprehending the congressional foot-dragging over the Violence Against Women Act. For those who have witnessed first-hand the impact of abuse and its troubling prevalence in the Native population, VAWA doesn’t seem controversial; it seems logical.

But VAWA, like so many other positive initiatives these days, has fallen victim to the climate of polarization, and is being kicked about relentlessly as a political football.

Although some negotiators in the House of Representatives agree VAWA is necessary in principle, they continue to haggle over a 10-page portion of the measure that would allow tribal police and courts to go after non-Indians who assault women on tribal land. With Native American women 2-1/2 times more likely to be raped than their sisters of other races, that segment would seem sensible to those in high Native populations. They know U.S. attorneys are often overburdened with other cases and based hundreds of miles from the probable location of an assault, and these victims were falling through the cracks in the justice system far too often.

The more conservative opponents of the legislation seem more worried about accused assailants having their rights stripped than the survival of victims. They fear tribal courts aren’t equipped to handle such cases, and that the alleged rapists, beaters and molesters may be deprived of their “constitutional rights.” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, is one of the detractors; he says the clause aims to “satisfy the unconstitutional demands of special interests.” But Native American groups and women’s rights proponents like to think of themselves of voters, rather than special interests, and they say their “interest” is assuring that all victims of violence have protection under the law.

In Tahlequah, the implications are more far-reaching than in many other places. According to Pam Moore, director of the Institute for Native Justice, if VAWA is not continued, the anti-violence work of entities like Help-In-Crisis, the Cherokee Nation, Northeastern State University and the District Attorney’s Office could be gravely impacted. Moore should know; she was the founding executive director of Help-In-Crisis, the venerable agency that provides counseling, shelter and other services to battered women and their children. More than 500 families receive emergency shelter from HIC each year.

Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., has lately been a beacon of sensibility in the irrational brouhaha over the national budget and other matters like this one. He says this bill should be “routine,” and wonders why opponents are standing in the way of protection for vulnerable native women over a “philosophical point.”

Cole and others have met time and again with Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House majority leader, but so far they’ve been unable to get their compatriots to see past their misgivings with tribal courts systems. Proposed compromises – such as an offer to allow non-Indian defendants a chance to appeal to federal law enforcement authorities after arrest and conviction – have thus far fallen on deaf ears.

Blame it on bigotry, lack of information, or fear of “otherness,” but this issue has drawn another line not just between conservative and liberal, but between conservative and conservative.

Those who have seen the problems close-up and personal think bias is the culprit. Cole understands that, too, and he told the New York Times some of his colleagues seem to “fear Indians are going to take out 500 years of mistreatment on us through this.”

Of course, “mistreatment” – and the driving desire to get rid of it – is exactly what VAWA aims to accomplish. And as simplistic as it sounds, if aggressors are determined to visit their atrocities upon women or other victims on tribal lands, then they should not be surprised if tribal authorities seek to prosecute them for their wrongdoing.

Congress should pass VAWA, and we should let our representatives hear from  us. They’re here to serve us, not the other way around.

Text Only
  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

  • Mom responsible for watching kid; restaurant’s not

    If you allowed your child to drink a bottle of drain cleaner, would you feign surprise when he fell to the floor, twitching and foaming at the mouth? If you left your curling iron within reach of your baby and she pulled it off the vanity and burned her hand, would you plan revenge on the store that sold you the appliance?
    You just might, if you’re among the litigious Americans who have abdicated parental responsibility to either sloth or the hope of a better tomorrow through a cash settlement.

    March 19, 2014


What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Disbanding Muslim Surveillance Draws Praise Hundreds Missing After South Korean Ferry Sinks Passengers Abuzz After Plane Hits Swarm of Bees Boston Bomb Scare Defendant Appears in Court Pistorius Trial: Adjourned Until May 5 Diaz Gets Physical for New Comedy Raw: Ferry Sinks Off South Korean Coast Town, Victims Remember Texas Blast Freeze Leaves Florida Panhandle With Dead Trees At Boston Marathon, a Chance to Finally Finish Are School Dress Codes Too Strict? Raw: Fatal Ferry Boat Accident Suspicious Bags Found Near Marathon Finish Line Boston Marks the 1st Anniversary of Bombing NYPD Ends Muslim Surveillance Program 8-year-old Boy Gets His Wish: Fly Like Iron Man Sex Offenders Arrested in Slayings of CA Women India's Transgenders Celebrate Historic Ruling Tributes Mark Boston Bombing Anniversary Raw: Kan. Shooting Suspect Faces Judge