Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

October 5, 2012

Do research before voting

TAHLEQUAH — If you’re wondering why politicians make patently false comments during debates and expect the public to believe them, it’s because people do, in fact, believe them.

This is as much true of Wednesday night’s face-off between President Barack Obama and Republican contender Mitt Romney as anywhere else. Irrational partisans from both the left and right will assert victory for their respective candidates, regardless of whether these supporters watched the proceedings. The same can be said for pundits. And as for polls on who won, people on Facebook and other social media are already boasting how they invested four minutes of their time to skew survey results.

How can a sincerely inquiring mind separate fact from fiction, and make rational choices at the polls? It’s not easy, but it starts with research. And that means reading and asking questions, rather than simply watching a debate – a staged scenario that prompts each candidate to say what he believes viewers will want to hear. And part of what viewers want to hear is relentless attacks on the opponent, even if those attacks aren’t grounded in truth.

For instance, Obama insisted Romney’s core economic plan calls for a $5 trillion tax cut, in addition to the Bush tax cuts, which the president calculated at another $1 trillion. Romney denied “having” a $5 trillion tax cut. Notwithstanding the fact that the average American can scarcely comprehend the meaning of the word “trillion,” both candidates muddled the issue further. Romney has, indeed, proposed cutting tax rates by 20 percent. According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, that would slice tax revenue by nearly $500 billion in 2015, or $5 trillion within 10 years. Romney added his tax plan will be “revenue neutral” because he’ll throw out loopholes and deductions, which he has yet to specify. The Tax Policy Center says Romney’s figures don’t bear out a “revenue neutral” plan. Romney insists “other studies” support his claim, but they don’t. On the other hand, Obama’s implication that higher taxes for middle-class Americans will bolster Romney’s plan is a blatant scare tactic. There’s virtually no chance Romney could push through such a tax hike in today’s economic climate, even if he wanted to.

A number of “facts” cited by both candidates are clearly erroneous, as pointed out by non-partisan fact-checking sites. The “non-partisan” label is borne out by the reality that both candidates stand equally accused of the sin of exaggeration. Folks who don’t accept the validity of reputable fact-checkers are too enthralled with their respective candidates, or too blinded by hatred of their opponents. If you’re somewhat open-minded and want to compare notes, check out http://tinyurl.com/99vwcy7 or http://tinyurl.com/9llcd7z.

Over the next few weeks, Americans will have two more opportunities to see each man “exaggerate” his own position, and denigrate those of his opponent, in televised debates Oct. 16 and 22. Those who care about what the vice presidential candidates have to say can tune in Oct. 11. But doing the research yourself, and talking to intelligent people you trust to be fair and even-handed, will be far more helpful.

What do you and your family care most about? Do you see the middle class as being unfairly burdened and squeezed, while the more fortunate get a pass, or do you believe the innovation of “job creators” can pull the country up by the bootstraps? Is the rising cost of health care a concern for you, and what’s the best way to address that? Should the government shun any role in regulating what goes on in the boardroom, but use a heavy hand with what goes on in the bedroom, or vice versa? Should American jobs go overseas? Is private enterprise the ultimate answer for what ails us? Should entitlements for many folks be cut?

Think about what’s good for your family, and what’s good for the country. Most of all, think about what’s morally right, according to your deepest-held religious or philosophical beliefs. Then do the research on both men, and you’ll be ready for Nov. 6. You can watch the debates, too – but don’t believe everything you hear.

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

  • Mom responsible for watching kid; restaurant’s not

    If you allowed your child to drink a bottle of drain cleaner, would you feign surprise when he fell to the floor, twitching and foaming at the mouth? If you left your curling iron within reach of your baby and she pulled it off the vanity and burned her hand, would you plan revenge on the store that sold you the appliance?
    You just might, if you’re among the litigious Americans who have abdicated parental responsibility to either sloth or the hope of a better tomorrow through a cash settlement.

    March 19, 2014

Poll

What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
Undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Raw: Royal Couple Visits Australia Mountains Raw: Pro-Russian Militants Killed on Base Captain of Sunken South Korean Ferry Apologizes Boston Bombing Survivors One Year Later Sister of Slain MIT Officer Reflects on Bombing Raw: Blast at Tennessee Ammunition Plant Kills 1 Hoax Bomb Raises Anxiety in Boston Egypt Clamps Down on Mosques to Control Message After Fukushima, Japan Eyes Solar Power New York Auto Show Highlights Latest in Car Tech Ex-California City Leader Gets 12 Year Sentence Disbanding Muslim Surveillance Draws Praise Hundreds Missing After South Korean Ferry Sinks Passengers Abuzz After Plane Hits Swarm of Bees Town, Victims Remember Texas Blast At Boston Marathon, a Chance to Finally Finish Are School Dress Codes Too Strict?
Stocks