Tahlequah Daily Press

Editorials

November 13, 2013

E-cigs: City should slow down and study the issue

TAHLEQUAH — When it comes to the controversial proposal to curtail the use of electronic cigarettes on city-owned property, the Tahlequah City Council should slow down, take a deep collective breath, and do more research.

Since a few days before the Nov. 4 council meeting, calls, texts, emails, and Facebook posts have inundated the Daily Press. A petition has been circulating in advance of the Monday, Nov. 18 special council meeting, when a vote could take place. This is a hot-button issue, possibly the most divisive to go before the council since Jason Nichols was elected mayor. Everyone seems to have a dog in this fight.

Those putting forth the measure may be doing so partially to safeguard the public health, but since the jury’s still out on what effect second-hand “vapor” might have, the pursuit of grant money is more likely the impetus. This is understandable; with slashes to every government-funded budget imaginable, agencies and organizations are grasping at every penny to keep worthy programs intact.

Many smokers have expressed the opinion that if they can do without their nicotine fix to take their kids to a park for a few hours, the “vapers” should be able to do the same. They ask why vapers should get to use their products in public spaces, when tobacco is banned. E-cigarette users have a ready response: There are no known adverse health affects from second-hand vapor, and though nicotine is indeed a drug, it’s far less harmful than the tar and other substances delivered by tobacco. E-cig users naturally object to their product’s being classified with “tobacco,” since it’s nothing of the kind. They also wonder if nicotine patches, or other legal drugs – like caffeine – will soon be on the hit list.

Businesses that sell e-cigarette products understandably want the use of their products to be as widespread as possible. They tout e-cigs as a way to quit smoking, and that appears to be true. On the other hand, Big Tobacco – and those who sell tobacco products – have a vested interest in tamping down the e-cigarette trend, which is why they’re funneling millions of dollars toward that goal.

Next, we have the members of the city’s administration, who may or may not personally favor restrictions on e-cigs, but who feel obligated to listen to presentations from citizen groups. And finally, there are the folks who don’t necessarily partake of e-cigs, but who just don’t want the government curtailing any more of their personal freedoms.

Many suspect the city council and members of the health coalition are deliberately trying to exert more influence over the lives of the public. That claim doesn’t make much sense, because those responsible for passing the ordinance could be jeopardizing their political futures. It must also be noted that individual liberty ends when it encroaches on someone else’s freedom.

The volatility of this ordinance suggests it needs more thought, with an eye toward compromise. Coalition representative Carol Choate has said there’s no rush; if that’s the case, why push it through so quickly?

Officials should take time to study public opinion, and how the use of e-cigarettes affects the community as a whole. While a couple of cities in Oklahoma have put restrictions in place, others have delayed plans for further scrutiny.

The impulse to ban the products in buildings like the courthouse is understandable, but what about on other city property? Are vapers causing problems in city parks? What about sidewalks and streets? Could the ordinance be used at some point to prohibit businesses from allowing vaping on their premises, as some fear? If so, that’s a bad idea: Since the state hasn’t seen fit to take action when it comes to private property, Tahlequah shouldn’t, either. And does it have to be all or nothing? Has anyone discussed having certain spots in parks where vaping is allowed, or would this create an enforcement nightmare?

There are too many questions to take action Nov. 18. Let’s not get the cart before the horse.

1
Text Only
Editorials
  • Ban on wage hikes by municipalities a mark of hypocrisy

    The words “God” and “governor” may share the same first two letters, but the two are hardly interchangeable.
    But let’s assume Gov. Mary Fallin really isn’t deluded enough to place her powers on the level of a deity. What rationale would a woman who has championed smaller government and local control use to explain her hypocrisy in banning individual Oklahoma cities from raising minimum wages in their jurisdictions?

    April 18, 2014

  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014

Poll

What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
Undecided.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video
Raw: More Than 100,000 Gather for Easter Sunday Raw: Greeks Celebrate Easter With "Rocket War" Police Question Captain, Crew on Ferry Disaster Raw: Orthodox Christians Observe Easter Rite Ceremony Marks 19th Anniversary of OKC Bombing Raw: Four French Journalists Freed From Syria Raw: Massive 7.2 Earthquake Rocks Mexico Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest
Stocks