Tahlequah Daily Press


November 26, 2012

If you carry, then stay safe

TAHLEQUAH — A couple of weeks ago, Oklahoma’s new “open carry” firearms law went into effect. And while there’s been a bit of hullabaloo in some quarters, the law hasn’t changed that much from its original status. Now, instead of carrying a concealed weapon, Okies and their licensed friends and family from other states can carry them in holsters or over their shoulders. Indeed, several business owners have told the Press they’d prefer to “see” the guns rather than wonder if each customer has one hidden.

Senate Bill 1733 strikes the word “concealed” from the original text. In general, carrying a loaded or unloaded weapon is still illegal, unless the carrier has a state-issued handgun license. Business and property owners can also carry guns openly on their own property, and they can prohibit others from carrying guns onto that same property. That latter stipulation has met with objections of some local gun owners, who believe if they have the license and latitude to carry guns, they should be able to carry them anywhere they choose. That’s a puzzling attitude. Many people who pushed for the ability to carry guns, either openly or concealed, did so because they believed it was a matter of personal liberty – a freedom they are granted and guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

If “freedom” and “liberty” are the buzz words , it seems logical they would apply to a business owner who would prefer his customers not be packing. After all, if an entrepreneur can make the demand of “no shirt, no shoes, no entry,” why can he not refuse service on the basis of gun possession? And though businesses don’t technically have to put up a sign to ban firearms, it’s prudent and courteous to customers to make that policy plain. Some gun owners have said they won’t do business in a place where their weapons aren’t welcome. In tit for tat fashion, others say they won’t enter a store where firearms are allowed. For many business owners, it’s a no-win scenario.

There are other places where firearms are banned. While some gun owners don’t like it, others see the wisdom of prohibiting guns at venues where tempers are likely to flare, or where large crowds could lead to mayhem, even if the one brandishing the weapon is among the most responsible and best-trained individuals. These include city, state and federal buildings, and places where governmental bodies or entities meet or conduct business; school properties and school buses; bars, taverns and clubs where drinking is the primary endeavor; professional sporting events or gambling venues; and colleges, universities and tech centers, except under certain circumstances.

The ability to carry guns is always going to be a hot-button issue - even in a state like Oklahoma, where most people have guns, and where a solid percentage of those who own them believe they should have the right to tote them around. But they should also respect the feelings of those who fear the proliferation of guns could be a recipe for trouble, and who can readily refute those who claim that if every law-abiding citizen carried a gun, we’d all be safer.

The public can only ask what is reasonable: that respect be accorded to all people for divergent opinions, and those who carry guns be careful with this privilege. There are stories of well-meaning people whose own weapons have been turned against them. Let’s everyone do their part to make sure we’re all safe.

Text Only
  • Ban on wage hikes by municipalities a mark of hypocrisy

    The words “God” and “governor” may share the same first two letters, but the two are hardly interchangeable.
    But let’s assume Gov. Mary Fallin really isn’t deluded enough to place her powers on the level of a deity. What rationale would a woman who has championed smaller government and local control use to explain her hypocrisy in banning individual Oklahoma cities from raising minimum wages in their jurisdictions?

    April 18, 2014

  • Community cleanups a good way to ensure our collective success

    This is our community – and it’s no better than what we make it. Let’s make it look great.

    April 16, 2014

  • Attack at school in Pennsylvania: Mental illness root of problem

    Washington’s crusade against guns was dealt a severe blow on Wednesday. No, it wasn’t the Supreme Court curtailment of the Second Amendment right of all Americans to own firearms. It wasn’t an executive order handed down by the administration. It was the brutal assault by a high school student in Pennsylvania against his fellow students – with a knife.

    April 14, 2014

  • People with faulty zippers should be booted from office

    We may forgive, but we shouldn’t forget, because there’s serious work to do in Washington. That work will never be accomplished as long as flawed zippers - literally or figurately – are a pervasive problem.

    April 11, 2014

  • Do your part to fight animal and child abuse

    It’s hard to change the habits of an abuser, especially when mitigating factors – such as alcohol or drugs – are involved. And these patterns tend to repeat themselves in successive generations. But all of us can take one small step to help eradicate this epidemic, and that is to report it when we see it.

    April 9, 2014

  • NSA head lies to Congress, and seems to get away with it

    Is there an obvious pattern of criminality within these governmental agencies? If so, why isn’t the Judicial Department investigating?

    April 7, 2014

  • Pass for rich kiddie rapist proves that justice isn’t blind

    Someone in Wilmington, Del., needs to keep an eye on Superior Court Judge Jan Jurden for the next few months, because she might improve her standard of living due to a sudden influx of cash.
    There’s no other way to explain why Jurden would have sentenced an ultra-wealthy heir to the du Pont fortune to probation for raping his 3-year-old daughter. It’s an outrageous miscarriage of justice that once again proves when it comes to the U.S. justice system, the elite get a pass almost every time.

    April 4, 2014

  • Maybe it’s not $3.2B, but state should still account for tribal cash

    In an editorial published last week, the Daily Press said that through tribal compacts, the state of Oklahoma received about $3.2 billion in annual revenue, partly attributable to the 117 casinos (or 118, in some reports) run by 33 tribes in the state. The information we accessed for that piece was confusing, and had a typo or two, which may have led us to overstate – to a considerable degree – how much money the tribes actually give the state.

    April 2, 2014

  • Tribal compacts should mean state has money to perform its functions

    Oklahoma should be rolling in the dough. The statistics bear that out. Thirty-three American Indian tribes operate 117 casinos in this state. Thanks to “compacts,” these tribes have been sharing the wealth with the state of Oklahoma. And thanks to the casinos, that wealth is substantial.

    March 28, 2014

  • It’s time to turn in your candidate announcements

    If you are running for a political office for which Cherokee County voters can cast ballots, it’s time to turn in your announcement. We’ve already run a few, and expect several more. The primary elections are Tuesday, June 24, with the registration period to vote in this election closing Thursday, May 30.

    March 24, 2014


What to you think of a state Legislature proposal to forbid cities from raising the minimum wage? Choose the closest to your opinion.

The federal government should set the minimum wage across the board.
States should be allowed to raise their minimum wages, but not cities.
Both states and cities should be allowed to raise their minimum wages.
Cities should be allowed to raise their mimum wages, but not states.
There should be no minimum wage at all.
     View Results
Tahlequah Daily Press Twitter
Follow us on twitter
AP Video