Published September 01, 2008 12:43 pm - A panel discussion revealed the many facets of native perception during The State of Sequoyah Commission Friday.
Indian identity remains in question
By BETTY SMITH
More than five centuries after Europeans made their first recorded contact with Native Americans, who they mistakenly termed Indians, the debate continues over who can claim to be Indian.
Is it the fullblood, whose ranks continue to decline, or the person with a large percentage of Indian blood?
Is it the person who meets a blood quantum, such as the requirement by the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians that its members be at least one-quarter blood?
Is it the person who, although having a slight degree of Indian blood, can prove descent from a person allotted land by the Dawes Commission and thereby has a card?
Or is it the person who, by whatever claim of family descent, claims Indian blood and perhaps a membership in one of dozens of “tribes” that have filed claims but have not been federally recognized?
And what can bona fide tribes, and their members, do about those with fraudulent claims?
A panel discussed all these cases during the concluding session of the State of Sequoyah Commission’s annual conference Friday at Northeastern State University. And during the discussion, one man who objected to its conclusions was ejected from the University Center.
“There are a number of issues that need to be addressed with different people in different states who come together and claim to be tribes,” said Dr. Richard Allen, policy analyst for the Cherokee Nation “We would like to make impersonation of a tribe, or a tribal citizen, a felony,” said Cara Cowan Watts, Cherokee tribal councilor.
“You can’t just create one. You can’t just make up an Indian tribe, culture or people. You can’t split off from another Indian tribe.”
The afternoon began with a presentation by the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma on the controversy over whether descendants of Cherokee Freedmen should be considered full Cherokee citizens.
Principal Chief Chad Smith then discussed the lengthy court battle over the freedmen issue, saying the federal courts should be allowed to determine the outcome of the pending case.
Dr. Jerry Bread presented a group of Native American studies majors from the University of Oklahoma who presented a debate on the freedmen issue.
As the students made their presentations, Murv Jacob, a longtime Tahlequah artist who portrays traditional Cherokee themes, went from table to table distributing copies of his letter to the editor published in Friday’s Daily Press. As he was doing so he exchanged words with Bread and Allen.
They and several other men escorted him from the hall outside the Herb Rozell Ballroom and down the steps of the University Center.
“I’m being dragged out of here!” Jacob exclaimed.