Brooks has never been one to overreact (react at all) to in-game/in-series developments, but it's starting to get ridiculous. His reluctance to adapt got the Thunder beat a year ago, and it will get a lesser team blown out of the conference semi-finals this time around.
2.) Why is Durant playing point forward?
He turns it over in the back court at least twice a game, not to mention every time he attempts to split defenders in the front court. Not because he isn't a good ball handler – he has great handles – but because physics intervenes when you're eight feet tall. There's a lot of distance for the basketball to travel. When Durant does clear the timeline the offense is stagnant.
I'm all for KD getting a lion's share of shots up, but I want him to do that through the flow of the offense, not in some forced ball stopping role. Free him up for catch and shoot opportunities (when he's at his best) and get him iso'd when he's not being doubled (when he's at his second best). Reggie Jackson is good enough to run the offense as the point guard. Derek Fisher is capable enough to spell him. There's no reason to change the entire complexion of the offense to focus on Durant. He's naturally the focal point.
3.) Breaking up is the hardest part
I pulled for James Harden all season, remained a fan of his in spite of the fact that he signed his own ticket out of town last fall. I watched the Rockets every chance I got and truly enjoyed the fact that Harden was free to play the role of alpha dog without being forced to defer.
And then this series started. And then Beverley took out Westbrook. And then Harden called Durant's Game 3 clincher "a lucky shot."